Thirty-two statements, one bubble each. It sorts you along the four preference axes that Jung proposed and Briggs and Myers turned into a four-letter code — and it shows you how far from the middle each letter actually sat, which is the part most type tests leave out.
Where attention naturally goes, and what restores you. Not shyness — a sociable person can still find company expensive.
What you trust as information: the concrete and measurable, or the pattern and the implication.
What settles a hard decision — consistency of logic, or the weight of what it costs people. Both are judgements; neither is emotion.
How you'd rather hold the outside world: decided and closed, or open and still gathering.
Answer for how you generally are, not how you'd like to be or how you are at work. First instinct beats a considered one here. There is no neutral dodge — the middle bubble means genuinely torn, not unsure.
Each axis scores from −16 to +16. The letter is just the sign of that number, so a score of +1 and a score of +15 produce the same letter and mean very different things. The gauge is the honest output; the four-letter code is a convenient label sitting on top of it.
Scores on these axes are distributed as a single hump, not two camps — most people sit near the middle, so the cut that assigns a letter falls exactly where the population is densest. That's why a meaningful share of people retest into a different code within weeks.
Type frameworks like this one describe preferences reasonably well and predict performance, compatibility or suitability for a job poorly. Treat the result as vocabulary for talking about yourself, not as a finding.
An original questionnaire written for this page. It is not the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®, which is a copyrighted instrument published by The Myers-Briggs Company and properly administered with a qualified practitioner. No affiliation, no endorsement.
Your answers stay in this browser. Nothing is transmitted, stored on a server, or attached to you.